LAPULAPU CITY — A decades-long arrangement at Camella Homes in Bankal, Lapulapu City is about to change after the subdivision’s Camella Homeowners Association, Inc. (CHAI) moved to formally reclaim management of the community tennis court, sparking a debate over vested rights, finances, and who gets to control common spaces.
In a meeting held today, October 19, the Camella Homeowners Association (Cebu) Inc., led by President Esperanza “Eve” Montesclaros Montanez, announced it will take over the supervision, maintenance, and scheduling of the tennis court under the Magna Carta of Homeowners and Homeowners Associations, Republic Act 9904 and its revised Implementing Rules and Regulations.
The tennis facility has been operated for years by the Camella Homes Tennis Club (CHTC) headed by President Ricardo Rabe. The club maintains it has “vested rights” to the area based on 33 years of established use and has asked the association to reimburse approximately ₱2 million for past improvements and maintenance.
Montanez said the takeover is not about shutting down the club, but about putting the court under the same rules that govern other common areas in Phase 1 (Barangay Bangkal) and Phase 2 (Barangay Paha).
“While the tennis club will still exist and members can continue to play, the management, supervision, and maintenance of the facility will transition to the association to ensure it aligns with subdivision standards,” Montanez explained.
She cited RA 9904, which gives the duly-registered homeowners association the legal authority to manage all common areas and facilities within the subdivision.
The association also raised safety concerns. It plans to bring in a MECO-accredited electrician to assess the court’s electrical connections and correct wiring that does not meet standards.
Joe Destura of the Federation of Unified Homeowners Associations in Lapu-Lapu City backed the move, saying the unified association holds sole authority to manage open spaces like basketball courts and tennis courts. Access, he stressed, should be reserved for homeowners and association members to prevent unauthorized use.
A major sticking point is the tennis club’s request for reimbursement.
Montanez said the association cannot pay any amount without legitimate supporting documents, official receipts, and proof of collection from club members. The club has been operating with its own group since 2019, but the board is questioning whether it had proper authorization to collect funds independently.
“Provide a detailed breakdown and documentation to prove that the 2-million-peso claim is valid and that previous collections were handled legally,” Montanez said.
What happens next
Both sides agreed to continue talks within a week, in a neutral venue, before the tennis court is reopened. Key agenda items include, the coordination on scheduling, that all playing sessions must now be coordinated with the CHAI).
Second is facility assessment – MECO electrician to inspect electrical safety and financial audit, for the Club to submit receipts and records for the ₱2M claim.
Rabe, for the tennis club, reiterated the group’s position that their long history in the subdivision gives them rights over the space. The association countered that if an area is classified as common space, it must be under the supervision of the entire homeowners’ association.
The Camella HOA collects ₱500 monthly dues per household, which fund security, streetlights, and cleaning. Montanez said any improvements to the tennis court will now be included in the association’s overall budget and planning.
As of now, CHAI and the tennis club agreed to maintain the status quo, as the homeowners’ association starts to rehabilitate and manage the operations of the tennis court.
The dispute highlights a growing issue in many subdivisions: balancing long-standing club operations with the legal mandate that common areas be managed for the benefit of all homeowners. (Photos: MBCNewman)


















